|
Myths
and
Realities
about
Unemployment
in
Saudi
Arabia
By
Kevin
R.
Taecker
Saudi
Arabia's
current
five-year
plan,
covering
the
period
2000-2004,
deals
extensively
with
the
challenges
posed
by
Saudi
demographics
and
unemployment.
Briefly,
the
plan's
demographic
data
(illustrated
below)
point
to
a
large
'youth
bulge'
in
the
Saudi
population.
As
a
result,
the
numbers
of
Saudi
young
people
leaving
school
and
entering
the
job
market
every
year
are
large
and
growing
every
year.
The
labor
market
they
are
entering
appears
unfriendly
in
many
respects.
During
the
plan
period,
there
will
be
little
growth
in
government
hiring,
and
the
private
sector
workplace
is
overwhelmingly
dominated
by
more
or
less
entrenched
expatriates.
For
every
one
Saudi
working
in
the
private
sector,
there
are
four
expatriates.
The
schools
are
producing
male
and
female
graduates
in
approximately
equal
numbers
with
equivalent
qualifications,
but
only
20%
of
the
national
workforce
are
women
of
which
fewer
than
one
in
ten
are
Saudis.
The
plan's
solution,
in
a
nutshell,
is
to
restructure
the
Saudi
economy
in
order
to
find
the
needed
jobs
in
the
private
sector
-
in
the
near
term
by
replacing
expatriates
(job
"Saudi-ization")
and
for
the
long
term
through
greater
investment
for
economic
diversification
and
growth.
According
to
free
market
principles,
the
plan
aims
to
accelerate
the
expansion
and
diversification
of
the
private
sector
by
much
more
generally
privatizing,
liberalizing,
opening-up,
and
reforming
the
economy.
By
providing
national
treatment
and
leveling
the
playing
field
for
both
local
and
foreign
businesses
and
investors,
the
plan
encourages
Saudi
industries
and
service
providers
to
enhance
their
competitiveness.
And,
through
Saudi
Arabia
joining
the
World
Trade
Organization
and
unifying
Gulf
Cooperation
Council
markets,
and
implementing
the
Arab
Free
Trade
Zone,
the
plan
would
open-up
and
stimulate
new
market
regions
-
the
better
for
Saudi
businesses
to
exercise
their
comparative
and
competitive
advantages
in
order
to
extend
and
expand.
Under
the
plan
scenario,
by
2005
the
Saudi
economy
will
be
more
than
50%
owned
and
controlled
by
the
private
sector,
up
from
about
42%
in
1999.
Market
openings
for
private
businesses
appear
in
virtually
every
subsector
of
the
economy,
including
for
energy
(the
natural
gas
initiative)
and
government
(e.g.,
the
privatization
of
medical
services
and
insurance).
Economic
Dream
and
Vision
This
is
a
great
vision,
and
strides
have
already
been
made
toward
realizing
it.
But
to
the
extent
that
the
called-for
reforms
and
market
changes
have
not
been
accomplished
it
is
also
a
dream
-
a
dream
that
is
helpful
and
well-conceived,
but
still
a
dream.
The
reality
is
that
transforming
the
Saudi
labor
market
is
a
daunting
task.
In
effect,
it
requires
every
business
in
the
country
to
reorient
and
reorganize
itself.
Complicating
matters,
until
the
mid-90's
any
Saudi
needing
a
job
could
find
one
with
the
government
or
one
of
its
companies.
For
all
that
the
2000-2004
plan
has
to
say
about
employment,
it
provides
no
data
directly
addressing
unemployment.
The
first
publication
of
national
unemployment
data,
for
the
year
1999,
appeared
in
September
2002.
Looking
at
the
new
data
against
his
own
estimates,
Brad
Bourland
(the
Chief
Economist
of
Saudi
American
Bank)
characterized
the
unemployment
situation
as
"a
concern,
but
not
a
crisis."
|
Unemployment
in
the
Near
East,
North
Africa
and
Indian
Subcontinent
(Millions
in
the
Workforce:
Percentage
Unemployed)
|
|
Workforce |
Unemployed |
| Morocco |
11.0 |
23% |
| Syria |
4.7 |
20% |
| Jordan |
1.3 |
16% |
| Bahrain |
0.0 |
15% |
| Egypt |
20.6 |
12% |
| Turkey |
32.8 |
11% |
| India |
406.0 |
9% |
| Pakistan |
40.4 |
6% |
| Saudi
Arabia |
5.8 |
4% |
| Qatar |
0.0 |
3% |
| Kuwait |
1.3 |
2% |
|
|
|
| Yemen |
N/A |
30% |
| Iraq |
4.4 |
N/A |
| Afghanistan |
10.0 |
N/A |
| UAE |
1.6 |
N/A |
| Oman |
0.1 |
N/A |
|
| Source:
CIA
World
Factbook
and
KSA
national
data |
|
The
basics
are
not
so
bad,
in
that
the
overall
unemployment
rate
(for
Saudis
and
expatriates
together)
was
measured
at
4.3
percent.
For
a
developing
country
economy
going
through
structural
reforms,
where
major
sectors
of
the
economy
are
being
privatized
and
reorganized
(e.g.,
telecoms),
this
appears
very
near
full
employment
–
i.e.,
the
unemployment
level
below
which
the
economy
would
falter
for
lack
of
labor
supply
(workers).
Overall
unemployment
rates
for
many
other
countries
in
the
Middle
East,
North
and
East
Africa,
and
the
Indian
Subcontinent
are
much
higher
(they
are
very
far
away
from
reaching
full
employment)
which
explains
why
so
many
from
these
regions
come
to
work
in
Saudi
Arabia.
Of
the
5.6
million
people
employed
in
Saudi
Arabia
in
1999,
3.0
million
or
53%
were
expatriates
mostly
from
those
parts
of
the
world.
|
Unemployment
among
expatriates
is
only
0.8%,
reflecting
that
an
expatriate
worker's
immigration
status
is
entirely
tied
to
a
job.
Those
few
counted
as
unemployed
are
either
briefly
between
jobs
or
heading
home.
Not
covered
by
the
unemployment
data
are
the
undocumented
expatriate
workers
estimated
to
range
upwards
of
300,000
(10%
of
documented
expats).
There
are
periodic
round-ups/repatriations
of
Hajj
over-stayers
and
others
whose
papers
are
flawed.
But
they
work
at
the
lowest
ends
of
the
labor
market
(e.g.,
heavy
day
work
or
as
shepherds),
outside
the
formal
job
market.
Unemployment
Myths
and
Realities
|
The
Workforce
of
Saudi
Arabia
in
1999
|
|
Workforce |
Employed |
Unemployed |
Unemployment
Rate
|
| Millions
of
Workers |
| Saudis |
2.824 |
2.595 |
0.229 |
8.1% |
|
Men |
2.411 |
2.248 |
0.163 |
6.8% |
|
Women |
0.413 |
0.347 |
0.066 |
16.0% |
| Expatriates |
3.025 |
3.000 |
0.025 |
0.8% |
| Overall |
5.849 |
5.595 |
0.254 |
4.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
| Percentage
Share |
| Saudis |
48.3% |
46.4% |
90.2% |
|
|
Men |
41.2% |
40.2% |
64.2% |
|
|
Women |
7.1% |
6.2% |
26.0% |
|
| Expatriates |
51.7% |
53.6% |
9.8% |
|
| Overall |
100.00% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
|
|
| Source:
Saudi
Arabia
Central
Department
of
Statistics
(Ministry
of
Planning) |
In
1999,
the
unemployment
rate
for
the
Saudi
workforce
was
8.1
percent,
and
the
unemployment
rate
for
Saudi
males
was
only
6.8
percent
-
again,
levels
that
are
not
particularly
worrisome
by
regional
comparisons.
However,
an
examination
of
the
trends
and
components
underlying
these
figures
make
clear
that
unemployment
concerns
will
grow
in
the
future,
and
for
some
segments
of
the
job
market
are
already
fairly
serious.
Saudi
women
account
for
only
7.1
%
of
the
workforce.
Unemployment
among
women
is
reckoned
at
16%
-
more
than
double
the
6.8
%
unemployment
rate
for
Saudi
males.
However,
in
1999
the
Saudi
female
labor
participation
rate
was
extremely
low
at
only
about
4.5%
of
the
total
female
population.
Although
16%
unemployment
seems
high,
the
absolute
number
of
individuals
affected
is
small
(fewer
than
70,000
in
a
workforce
approaching
6
million).
The
much
larger
issue
relates
to
the
very
low
female
labor
participation
rate
itself,
which
indicates
the
Saudi
economy
functions
largely
without
the
benefits
of
the
productivity
and
income-earning
power
of
its
women.
Instead,
those
incomes
go
to
expatriates
who
remit
their
earnings
home
in
amounts
equaling
about
9%
of
annual
GDP
($14
billion
of
$161
billion
in
1999).
The
labor
participation
rate
for
Saudis
in
the
male
population
was
about
26%
--
quite
low
compared
to
rates
greater
than
50%
elsewhere
in
the
region.
In
addition
to
women
not
working,
the
main
reasons
for
this
is
the
youthfulness
of
the
Saudi
population
where
in
2000
some
56%
of
all
Saudis
were
less
than
20
years
old.
Thus,
the
Kingdom
has
a
very
high
Saudi
dependency
ratio,
where
in
1999
the
Saudis
who
did
not
work
outnumbered
the
Saudis
who
worked
by
a
ratio
of
5.7
to
one
(on
average
almost
6
dependents
per
worker).
The
dependency
ratio
for
expats
is
only
about
0.7
reflecting
that
most
foreign
workers
leave
their
families
at
home,
and
their
spending
in
the
Saudi
economy
is
generally
for
the
most
narrow
and
meager
basket
of
goods
and
services.
Ball
Park
Estimating
the
Real
Economic
Gains
of
Saudi-ization
|
Macroeconomic
Multiplier
Effects
of
Saudi
Workforce
"Saudi-ization"
(*Indicates
data
provided
by
the
Saudi
Central
Dept.
of
Stats
and
SAMA)
|
|
$-Billions |
Percentage |
| *Saudi
GDP:
Basis
Year
1999 |
$161.0 |
100.0% |
|
Oil
Sector
(mainly
Govt) |
$51.0 |
31.7% |
|
Govt
Sector |
$41.9 |
26.0% |
|
Private
Sector |
$68.1 |
42.3% |
|
All-in
Economic
Multipliers
(Ratios
Estimated
by
Taecker)
|
|
Saudi
Workers
Household
Sector |
2.5 |
|
Expat
Workers
Household
Sector |
0.8 |
|
Saudi-Expat
Difference |
1.7 |
|
| *Expatriate
Remittances |
$14.0 |
8.7% |
| Estimated
Expat
Household
Income
(Taecker
Estimate)
(Assuming
Remittances
=
50%
of
Exp
Income) |
$28.0 |
17.4% |
*1999-2004
Percentage
Saudi-ization
of
the
Workforce
*(Expats
as
%
of
workforce
decline
from
61.3%
to
51.6%) |
9.7%
|
1999-2004
Income
Transfer
to
Saudis
(1999
GDP
times
9%,
Taecker
Estimate) |
$2.7 |
1.7% |
Multiplier
Effect
gains
in
Saudi
GDP
from
Saudi-ization
(the
Income
Transfer
times
the
Difference
in
Multipliers) |
$4.6 |
2.9% |
| Multiplier
Effect
gains
in
relation
to
Saudi
Private
GDP
(up
to...) |
6.8% |
|
The
real
economic
costs
of
very
low
Saudi
labor
participation
rates
are
magnified
by
economic
multiplier
effects.
The
"all-in"
economic
multiplier
associated
with
Saudi
workers
(households)
is
conservatively
estimated
at
2.5,
meaning
every
1000
riyals
earned
and
spent
locally
by
a
Saudi
worker
directly
and
indirectly
produces
another
1500
in
income
as
this
spending
circulates
through
the
economy.
The
economic
multiplier
for
expats
is
fractional,
estimated
at
only
around
0.8,
reflecting
that
they
send
much
of
their
income
home.
Thus,
the
multiplier
effects
lost
to
the
economy
from
expats
holding
jobs
instead
of
Saudis
is
a
factor
of
1.7.
In
1999,
expat
annual
remittances
amounted
to
about
$14
billion.
Assuming
that
expats
send
on
average
about
½
their
incomes
home,
this
would
point
to
total
expat
incomes
of
about
$28
billion
(17%
of
GDP).
Taking
the
effects
of
the
difference
in
Saudi
and
expat
household
multipliers
into
account,
the
total
annual
economic
costs
of
relying
so
extensively
on
expatriate
labor
are
in
the
range
of
$47
billion
(1.7
times
$28
billion).
Between
1999-2004,
according
to
the
plan,
Saudi-ization
will
reduce
the
numbers
of
expats
in
the
workforce
by
about
2
percent
per
year
such
that
the
percentage
share
of
expats
in
the
workforce
will
drop
from
61.3%
to
51.6%
by
9.7
percent.
(This
seems
conservative
in
view
that
many
businesses
must
Saudi-ize
at
a
rate
of
5%
per
year.)
Gauging
against
the
$28
billion
of
expat
income
estimated
for
1999,
the
Saudi-ization
gain
would
point
to
some
$2.7
billion
of
income
transferred
from
expats
to
Saudis.
Thus,
by
2004
the
economy
could
enjoy
a
rise
in
annual
incomes
in
the
range
of
$4.6
billion
(1.7
times
$2.7
billion)
-
thanks
to
the
beneficial
economic
multiplier
effects
associated
with
successful
Saudi-ization.
Private
Sector
is
the
Winner
The
Saudi
private
sector
will
be
the
main
beneficiary.
The
bulk
of
these
effects
will
be
reflected
in
the
form
of
increased
purchases
of
goods
and
services
from
local
businesses.
The
$4.6
billion
would
represent
more
than
6.8%
of
1999
private
sector
GDP
-
a
real
and
substantial
reward
for
doing
their
part
to
meet
the
plan's
modest
goals.
To
participate
in
this
rise
in
demand,
Saudi
businesses
will
need
to
expand,
hiring
more
Saudis.
Thus,
there
is
a
virtuous
economic
cycle
implicit
in
successful
Saudi-ization.
By
leading
the
economy
overall
to
higher
economic
multipliers
it
stimulates
business
growth
and
hiring,
pushing
the
economy
even
higher.
This
is
the
silver
lining
in
what
would
otherwise
appear
as
the
gloomiest
aspect
to
the
unemployment
report
-
namely,
the
very
high
and
rising
unemployment
rates
for
those
in
the
20-24
age
group.
In
this
age
bracket
(which
is
largely
made
up
of
first
time
jobseekers,
e.g.,
graduates),
the
unemployment
rates
for
Saudi
males
and
females
are
in
the
range
of
25%
and
33%,
respectively.
Sticky
Markets
The
good
news
is
that
there
are
several
hundred
thousand
young
Saudis
available
to
move
into
jobs
as
they
open-up.
The
bad
news
is
that,
unlike
smoothly
flowing
capital
or
commodity
markets,
labor
markets
are
sticky.
Once
hired
employees
tend
to
want
to
hold
on
to
their
jobs
and
employers
tend
to
keep
them.
Making
a
change
requires
overcoming
considerable
inertia,
and
the
changes
called
for
with
Saudi-ization
are
nothing
short
of
structural
for
many
Saudi
businesses.
To
make
the
changes
successfully
will
require
Saudi
businesses
to
rethink
the
importance
of
human
resources
to
their
enterprises.
Expats
earn
much
less
than
Saudis.
For
those
holding
high
school
diplomas
or
better,
the
average
monthly
compensation
to
expats
is
only
about
one-half
that
for
Saudis.
Among
university
graduates,
for
example,
expat
monthly
compensation
is
about
$1,500
versus
$2,900
for
a
Saudi.
But
these
are
broad
averages
that
count
long-time
jobholders
the
same
as
new
entrants.
From
the
perspective
of
the
businesses
considering
Saudi-ization,
the
more
important
indicator
is
the
marginal
wage
rate,
i.e.,
what
the
new
hire
will
accept,
not
what
all
those
already
on
the
payrolls
presently
earn.
In
keeping
with
its
strong
free
market
orientation,
the
Saudi
government
has
wisely
refrained
from
attempting
to
dictate
private
wage
levels.
Thus,
to
the
degree
that
Saudi
labor
is
oversupplied
in
the
market
the
wage
demands
of
Saudi
jobseekers
will
come
down.
Although
marginal
wage
levels
are
not
yet
reported,
there
is
plenty
of
anecdotal
evidence
to
believe
this
is
happening.
And
both
at
the
margin
and
across
the
existing
workforce,
rising
government
fees
and
tightening
immigration
requirements
are
adding
to
the
costs
and
difficulties
of
employing
expats
rather
than
Saudis.
So
the
actual
difference
between
what
it
costs
to
hire
a
Saudi
over
an
expat
is
smaller
than
the
difference
between
their
average
wages,
and
this
difference
is
shrinking.
Saudi
businesses
must
also
consider
the
issues
surrounding
worker
productivity.
A
trained
and
experienced
expat
appears
to
have
more
to
offer
than
a
Saudi
just
out
of
school.
While
this
might
be
for
the
very
short-term,
for
the
long-term
just
the
opposite
is
the
case.
Even
though
many
stay
for
a
lifetime,
by
definition
all
expat
workers
are
temporary.
They
leave
when
their
services
are
no
longer
needed
or
they
meet
their
own
personal
work
and
savings
goals.
Thus
the
businesses
that
rely
on
expats
have
little
reason
to
invest
in
the
productivity
of
their
workers
-
e.g.,
for
training
and
education.
Stagnant
Productivity
| Stagnant
productivity
represents
a
very
real
downside
for
the
businesses
that
over-rely
on
expats.
Absent
the
incentive
to
invest
in
the
productivity
of
their
workers,
they
can
rapidly
loose
their
competitive
edge.
By
contrast,
Saudi
workers
generally
respond
well
to
employer
efforts
to
enhance
their
productivity.
Employers
stand
to
be
rewarded
many
times
over
for
the
money
and
time
they
invest
in
their
Saudi
employees.
This
is
borne
out
by
the
fact
that
the
businesses
that
have
the
longest
standing
and
most
aggressive
Saudi-ization
programs
are
widely
regarded
as
being
among
the
strongest
and
most
competitive
among
their
peers
and
internationally,
whether
in
banking
(e.g.,
Saudi
American
Bank),
industry
(e.g.,
the
Arabian
Electronics
Corp.),
or
services
(e.g.,
Al-Aziziah). |
|
Recent
Productivity
Trends
|
|
Annual
Labor
Productivity
Growth
1991-1999
|
|
| East
Asia |
5.5% |
| United
States |
2.1% |
| Europe |
1.2% |
| Latin
America |
0.7% |
| Middle
East |
-0.1% |
| Sub-Sahara
Africa |
-0.5% |
|
Other
Miscellaneous
Myths
These
are
the
realities
about
the
Saudi
labor
market.
The
companies
that
Saudi-ize
effectively
and
anticipate
what
Saudi-ization
will
mean
for
national
income
and
spending
have
much
to
gain
-
as
would
any
American
partners
who
contribute
to
and
participate
in
this
process.
But
there
are
also
many
myths.
These
are
the
myths
that
portray
Saudis
workers
as
unstable,
ill-suited,
unwilling,
or
somehow
incapable
of
doing
the
work
that
needs
to
be
done.
There
is
the
myth
that
Saudis
lack
a
work
ethic,
and
the
myth
that
Saudi
schools
produce
graduates
that
are
unprepared
for
the
jobs
that
need
to
be
done.
Also
a
myth
is
the
notion
that
Saudi
workers'
expectations
are
hopelessly
mismatched
to
what
businesses
need
and
have
to
offer.
The
anecdotal
evidence
that
supports
these
myths
is
more
an
indication
of
labor
markets
in
transition
than
any
reflection
of
underlying
or
fundamental
weakness.
As
those
who
have
actually
hired
and
managed
Saudis
can
attest,
where
the
opportunities
are
present,
the
Saudi
work
ethic
is
alive
and
well.
Moreover,
Saudi
Arabia's
young
people
have
the
same
free
market
instincts
as
their
elders.
They
know
how
to
find
the
market-clearing
price
for
their
labors.
They
understand
what
education,
training,
and
experience
can
do
to
enhance
their
market
value.
As
for
the
basic
skills
and
knowledge,
Saudi
schooling
is
perfectly
adequate.
Indeed,
compared
to
their
peers
within
and
outside
the
region,
many
of
the
graduates
from
top
schools
are
quite
good.
But
schooling
is
not
just
about
book
knowledge
and
academic
skills.
If
there
is
a
failing
in
the
Saudi
education
system,
it
lies
in
the
area
of
workplace
acculturation
-
again
the
sort
of
shortcoming
that
is
symptomatic
of
transition.
The
need
to
diligently
and
systematically
replace
expatriates
in
the
workplace
is
a
very
new
phenomenon.
Until
the
mid-1990's,
expatriates
were
the
only
option
that
many
employers
had
to
fill
job
openings
because
there
were
simply
too
few
Saudis
in
the
workforce.
Only
recently
have
Saudi
businesses
begun
to
demand
that
the
Saudi
educational
institutions
play
greater
roles
to
instill
the
workplace
manners
and
ethics
needed
for
successful
Saudi-ization
in
their
own
businesses.
Upon
dissection,
some
of
these
myths
appear
for
what
they
are
-
forms
of
racism,
bias,
and
discrimination.
Today's
imperialists
and
pundits
from
the
West
share
in
a
long
tradition
of
doubting
Arab
capabilities
and
discounting
Arabian
achievement.
Any
characterization
that
would
detract
from
Saudi
workers
as
a
group
without
differentiation
must
be
eyed
with
suspicion.
The
oft-repeated
canards
about
a
Saudi
"population
time
bomb"
and
the
"brewing
of
chronic
joblessness"
are
of
this
ilk.
The
reality
is
that
the
Saudi
labor
market
is
going
through
a
long-anticipated
and
planned
for
transition.
The
process
is
extensively
supported
by
the
government
-
through
the
general
education
program
and
a
growing
number
of
specialized
programs.
For
the
businesses
operating
in
Saudi
Arabia
-
those
that
must
Saudi-ize
-
the
good
news
is
that
successful
Saudi-ization
in
many
respects
brings
its
own
rewards.
These
rewards
result
from
improving
the
mix
of
the
economic
multipliers
that
apply
to
Saudi
and
expat
households
in
the
national
economy.
And
even
greater
rewards
are
promised
thanks
to
the
productivity
gains
which
the
businesses
that
invest
effectively
in
Saudi-ization
can
enjoy.
At
the
margin,
the
costs
of
hiring
a
Saudi
vs.
an
expatriate
are
converging.
In
increasing
numbers
Saudi
businesses
are
coming
to
terms
with
the
changes
they
need
to
make
in
order
to
begin
to
fully
take
account
of
and
receive
the
benefits
from
their
human
resources.
In
the
process,
they
are
getting
a
grip
on
what
it
will
take
to
become
strong
and
competitive
-
locally,
regionally,
and
globally.
In
closing,
this
whole
situation
presents
special
opportunities
for
the
American
businesses
that
participate
in
the
U.S.-Saudi
economic
relationship.
For
reasons
too
numerous
to
list,
America
businesses
are
the
unrivaled
leaders
in
the
field
of
worker
productivity.
Some
say
this
reflects
the
effective
application
of
free
market
principles;
others
that
this
is
a
sign
of
the
flexibility,
resilience,
and
freedom
from
bias
that
characterizes
the
American
approach
to
life
generally
-
itself
a
reflection
of
the
benefits
America
enjoys
from
its
own
melting
pot
traditions.
Whatever
the
reasons,
Saudi
businesses
are
looking
for
help
in
tackling
the
productivity
issues
imbedded
in
the
efforts
to
Saudi-ize.
Real
and
substantial
rewards
await
them
if
they
succeed
-
the
rewards
associated
with
the
nearly
$5
billion
per
year
of
new
household
spending
that
is
possible
from
the
economics
of
improving
the
structure
of
the
workforce
by
2004.
They
also
stand
to
profit
in
the
broader
outlines
of
the
national
plan,
which
by
2005
would
deliver
more
than
half
the
economy
into
private
sector
hands.
The
American
companies
that
join
in
and
participate
stand
to
benefit
through
sharing
in
these
substantial
gains
--
gains
made
possible
through
the
restructuring
of
the
Saudi
labor
market.
|