|
[Washington,
D.C. -
January
29,
2003]
For many
Americans,
the
first
month of
a new
year can
hardly
have
transpired
successfully
if the
First
Leader
failed
to give
the
State of
the
Union
Address.
President
Bush
delivered
the
annual
speech
last
night to
a joint
session
of
Congress.
On
the day
after
this
important
occasion,
the
Saudi
American
Forum is
pleased
to
report
on the
state of
Saudi
Arabia-United
States
cooperation
in the
war on
terrorism.
Unabated
Bashing
A
report
at this
juncture
is
timely
for
various
reasons.
An
overriding
one is
that the
American
media's
rash of
negative
information
and
analysis
related
to the
Kingdom
continues
unabated.
The
phenomenon
began in
the
aftermath
of
September
11,
2001,
and was
accelerated
after
Saudi
Arabian
Crown
Prince
Abdallah
won
unanimous
backing
from all
22
members
of the
League
of Arab
States
for his
unprecedented
peace
proposal
to end
the
Arab-Israeli
conflict.
Unable
to find
bona
fide
fault
with the
proposal,
critics
elected
instead
to
attack
the
messenger
and the
messenger's
country.
In
contrast,
given
what is
at stake
in the
United
States'
relationship
with
Saudi
Arabia,
the
number
of
factually
correct
and
insightful
statements
appearing
on an
ongoing
basis in
published
reports
about
the
Kingdom
continues
to be
far
fewer
than one
might
imagine
or have
reason
to
expect.
This is
particularly
the case
with
regard
to
various
aspects
of
public
discourse
regarding
the
special
ties
between
Riyadh
and
Washington.
Many
Americans
and
Saudi
Arabians,
together
with
others
proud to
count
themselves
as the
allies
and
strategic
partners
of both,
remain
astonished
by the
stridency
and
shrillness
of large
section's
of the
media's
unrelenting
attacks.
They
also
find the
nature
and
extent
of the
smear
campaign
unprecedented
and
mean-spirited.
Harming
the
Relationship
No
one on
either
side can
deny
that the
ongoing
anger
and
confusion
of many
Americans
since
the 9-11
terrorist
attacks
stems
largely
from the
fact
that 15
of the
19
attackers
came
from the
southwestern
region
of the
Kingdom.
Neither
can one
deny
that the
prolongation
of such
sentiments
is, in
various
ways,
natural
and
understandable.
Despite
this,
large
numbers
of
American
and
Saudi
Arabian
analysts
are
taken
aback
that
such a
concerted
media
operation
to harm
the
relationship
is
coming
overwhelmingly
from
within
the
United
States.
Increasing
numbers
believe
that the
campaign
to
malign
the
Kingdom
and the
special
U.S.-Saudi
relationship
has gone
on for
far too
long.
They
also are
apprehensive
that its
continuance
poses
considerable
danger
to the
national
security,
people-to-people,
and
related
interests
of both
countries.
The
Concern
Significant
numbers
of
publishers
and
editors
responsible
for the
newspapers'
op-ed
pages,
weekly
journals,
and
television
and
radio
talk
shows
can
hardly
claim
that, in
reporting
on Saudi
Arabia
and the
Saudi
Arabia-US
relationship
since
September
11, they
have
consistently
adhered
to the
highest
standards.
A
critical
chorus
has
voiced
the view
that as
far as
honoring
the
ordinary
norms of
responsibility
are
concerned,
the
conventional
canons
of media
integrity
continue
to be
conspicuous
by their
absence.
What is
worse,
there
are no
known
instances
to date
where
any
publications
moguls
have
been
called
to
account.
On
the
other
hand,
many
would
ask
whether
there is
much ado
about
nothing
in this
instance,
claiming
that, if
anything,
there is
little
new in
this
regard.
Others
would
agree
and add
the
caveat
that as
the ties
between
no
countries
are
bereft
of
blemish
there
should
be
nothing
wrong
with
pointing
out what
those
blemishes
are.
But
neither
of these
two
points
is at
issue
here.
Rather,
the
concern
is of a
different
nature.
It is
that any
sustained
depiction
of
reality
that is
consistently
inaccurate
and
negative
with
regard
to the
multifaceted
web of
mutual
benefits
between
these
two
global
giants
is
unavoidably
laced
with
damaging
and
potentially
dangerous
consequences.
In
this
regard,
senior
officials
on both
sides
acknowledge
an
understated
reality
as to
what is
being
placed
at risk.
It is
embedded
in the
fact
that the
bilateral
relationship
is of
immense
mutual
benefit
to
Americans
and
Saudi
Arabians
alike.
It is
that the
range of
such
benefits
is such
that
many
foreign
policy
strategists
outside
the
Saudi
Arabian-United
States
relationship
find it
difficult
to
contemplate
that a
comparable
range of
advantages
could
accrue
to their
own
countries.
It is
that the
benefits
to both
Americans
and
Saudi
Arabians
that
derive
from the
relationship
are the
envy, if
not also
the
fantasy,
of
public
and
private
sector
leaders
in every
other
country
in the
world.
The
Issues
This
is the
context
in which
this
author
presents
herein a
collection
of
official
U.S. and
Saudi
Arabian
statements,
together
with
other
commentary
and
remarks
by the
top
leaders
in
America
and the
Kingdom,
on most
of the
issues
that
have
been and
remain
in the
media's
line of
sight.
In so
doing,
the
purpose
is to
provide
a source
of
information
and
reference
that
would
not
otherwise
be
readily
available
on what
high-ranking
American
and
Saudi
Arabian
leaders
have and
have not
said on
the
topics
in
question.
What
is
reported
here are
facts
forgotten
by many
who
continue
to
contend
that the
Kingdom
has not
been
sufficiently
forthcoming
in
aiding
American
officials
in their
efforts
to
investigate
9-11, to
stem the
tide of
criticism
against
the
United
States,
and to
improve
the
bilateral
relationship.
The
facts
presented
are
valid
through
a year
ago
today
and
refute
the
lingering
charges
that the
Kingdom
has been
inadequately
cooperative
from the
beginning.
The
greatest
number
of false
and
misleading
statements
and
analyses
that
continue
to
appear
in the
American
media
relate
to the
following:
- the
extent
to
which
the
Kingdom
has
or
has
not
condemned
terrorism;
- the
status
of
U.S.-Saudi
Arabian
investigations
of
the
September
11
terrorist
attacks;
- the
Saudi
Arabian-U.S.
relationship;
- the
allegations
of
Saudi
funding
for
terrorism;
- the
identification
and
freezing
of
terrorism's
financial
assets;
- the
question
of
Saudi
Arabian
support
for
Osama
bin
Laden;
and
- the
Kingdom's
education
system
and
anti-Americanism.
Documentation
The
documentation
herein
relates
not only
to an
official
institution
from
which
commentary
regarding
these
issues
and
questions
has
emanated.
It
relates
also to
the date
the
commentary
was
published.
The
statements
are also
linked
to many
of the
most
authoritative
individual
sources
of
American
and
Saudi
Arabian
responses
to these
and
related
issues.
The
material
covers
most of
the
frequently
asked
questions
since
September
11 and
continuing
through
mid-January
2003.
The
reason
for the
lessened
frequency
with
which
the
state of
Saudi-American
cooperation
on
terrorism
has been
reported
in the
past
several
months
is not
coincidental.
It is
the
result
of the
far
greater
worldwide
attention
to the
Iraq
crisis
and,
correspondingly,
a far
lower
profile
with
regard
to other
issues
than
before.
With
respect
to each
of the
topics
examined,
the
Kingdom's
policy
or
position
on the
issue or
question
in
dispute
is
presented
first,
followed
by
documentation
of
statements
from one
or more
American
officials
in
response.
I.
On Saudi
Arabian
Cooperation
with the
United
States
The
Kingdom's
Position
…
Crown
Prince
Abdullah
recently
described
Saudi
Arabian-United
States'
ties as
"excellent."
Cooperation
and
support
remains
very
high at
all
levels,
particularly
in
military,
diplomatic,
and
economic
affairs.
The
Kingdom
does,
however,
continue
to have
concerns
with
regard
to
American
policy
towards
the
Middle
East,
and it
continues
to urge
the
United
States
to
become
more
involved
in
efforts
to bring
peace to
the
region.
In
some of
his
repeated
statements
on this
subject,
the
Crown
Prince
has
expressed
a belief
in being
honest
and
sincere
with
one's
friends.
To this
end, he
has
frequently
indicated
the
belief
that
America's
earlier
prolonged
disengagement
from the
peace
process
was
wrong.
He
has also
consistently
stated
that
because
Washington's
subsequent
engagement
has been
more
rhetorical
than
operational,
this has
been and
continues
to be
not only
harmful
to
American
credibility,
but,
also,
dangerous
for the
region.
The
Crown
Prince
has
consistently
pointed
out that
the
Kingdom
has been
a loyal
friend
and ally
of the
United
States
for over
six
decades.
Indeed,
this
year
will
commemorate
the 70th
anniversary
since
diplomatic
relations
between
the two
countries
were
established.
Prince
Abdallah
and all
the
country's
top
leaders
have
emphasized
that the
two
countries
have a
multifaceted
range of
very
strong
ties,
and,
from
their
side,
they
intend
to keep
it this
way and,
in so
doing,
remain
committed
to the
fight
against
terrorism.
…And
the
Documentation
of
American
Officials'
Statements
"We've
had a
very
constructive
dialogue
with
Saudi
Arabia
on a
wide
range of
issues,
including
this
terrorist
financing
effort,
and as
you are
aware,
we're
very
satisfied
with the
level of
Saudi
cooperation."
Source:
Philip
Reeker,
Deputy
Spokesman,
U.S.
Department
of
State,
December
7, 2001
*
* *
|
"The
Saudis
have
been
very
responsive
to
our
…requests."
Source:
Paul
H.
O'Neill,
Secretary
of
the
Treasury,
November
7,
2001.
*
*
*
"…
[H]e
[President
Bush]
is
very
pleased
with
the
Kingdom's
contribution
to
the
[war]
efforts…
Press
articles
citing
differences
between
the
United
States
and
Saudi
Arabia
are
simply
incorrect."
Source:
Unnamed
White
House
Spokesman,
by
David
Ignatius,
"Fretting
over
the
Saudis,"
Washington
Post,
November
4,
2001.
|

President
Bush,
Treasury
Secretary
O'Neill
and
Secretary
of
State
Powell
|
*
* *
|

|
"We
have
a
very
good
relationship
with
the
Saudis.
We
will
continue
to
work
with
them
in
as
cooperative
a
fashion
as
possible
as
we
go
forward."
Source:
Victoria
Clarke,
Assistant
Secretary
of
Defense
for
Public
Affairs,
Ja | |